Week 3 Case Study Template
|
Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
1. Are the spirometry results consistent with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease? What is the most likely pulmonary diagnosis for this patient?
2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen pulmonary disease.
3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis
Management of the Disease
*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.
1. Classify the patient’s disease severity. Is this considered stable or unstable?
2. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
3. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
4. Identify two (2) “ Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
References
[Must be on a separate page and in APA format]
This assignment is worth 100 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Requirements
Content Criteria:
1. Read the case study listed below.
2. Refer to the rubric for grading requirements.
3. Utilizing the Week 3 Case Study TemplateLinks to an external site. , provide your responses to the case study questions listed below.
4. You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements. For this class, use of the textbook for pathophysiology statements is acceptable. You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal.
5. You must use the current Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the management and prevention of COPD (GOLD Criteria) to answer the classification of severity and treatment recommendation questions. The most current guideline may be found at the following web address: https://goldcopd.org/Links to an external site. . At the website, locate the current year’s CPG and download a personal copy for use. You may also use a medication administration reference such as Epocrates to provide medication names.
6. Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used.
Case Study Scenario
Chief Complaint A.C., is a 61-year old male with complaints of shortness of breath.
History of Present Illness
A.C. was seen in the emergency room 1 week ago for an acute onset of mid-sternal chest pain. The event was preceded with complaints of fatigue and increasing dyspnea for 3 months, for which he did not seek care. He was evaluated by cardiology and underwent a successful and uneventful angioplasty prior to discharge. Despite the intervention, the shortness of breath has not improved. Since starting cardiac rehabilitation, he feels that his breathlessness is worse. The cardiologist has requested that you, his primary care provider, evaluate him for further work-up. Prior to today, his last visit with your practice was 3 years ago when he was seen for acute bronchitis and smoking cessation counseling.
Past Medical History
· Hypertension
· Hyperlipidemia
· Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease
· Smoker
Family History
· Father deceased of acute coronary syndrome at age 65
· Mother deceased of breast cancer at age 58.
· One sister, alive, who is a 5 year breast cancer survivor.
· One son and one daughter with no significant medical history.
Social History
· 35 pack-year smoking history; he has cut down to one cigarette at bedtime following his cardiac intervention.
· Denies alcohol or recreational drug use
Real estate agent
Allergies
· No Known Drug Allergies
Medications
· Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily by mouth
· Carvedilol 25 mg twice daily by mouth
· Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily by mouth
· Aspirin 81mg daily by mouth
Review of Systems
· Constitutional: Denies fever, chills or weight loss. + Fatigue.
· HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.
· Chest: + dyspnea with exertion. Denies productive cough or wheezing. + Dry, nonproductive cough in the AM.
· Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.
· Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.
General Physical Exam
· Constitutional: Alert and oriented male in no apparent distress.
· Vital Signs: BP-120/84, T-97.9 F, P-62, RR-22, SaO2: 93%
· Wt. 180 lbs., Ht. 5’9″
HEENT
· Eyes: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation, normal conjunctiva.
· Ears: Tympanic membranes intact.
· Nose: Bilateral nasal turbinates without redness or swelling. Nares patent.
· Mouth: Oropharynx clear. No mouth lesions. Dentures well-fitting. Oral mucous membranes dry.
Neck/Lymph Nodes
· Neck supple without JVD.
· No lymphadenopathy, masses or carotid bruits.
Lungs
· Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields. + Bilaterally wheezes noted with forced exhalation along with a prolonged expiratory phase. No intercostal retractions.
Heart
· S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm, no rubs or murmurs.
Integumentary System
· Skin cool, pale and dry. Nail beds pink without clubbing.
Chest X-Ray
· Lungs are hyper-inflated bilaterally with a flattened diaphragm. No effusions or infiltrates.
Spirometry
Title | Predicted | Pre-bronchodilator | % Predicted | Post-bronchodilator | % Predicted | Change |
FVC (L) | 5.64 | 5.23 | 93 | 5.77 | 102 | 9% |
FEV1 (L) | 4.57 | 2.92 | 64 | 3.01 | 66 | 2% |
FEV1/FVC (%) | 81 | 56 | 69 | 52 | 64 | -5% |
TLC | 5.5 | 6.9 | 125 | 6.9 | 125 | 0% |
Case Study Questions
Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
1. Are the spirometry results consistent with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease? What is the most likely pulmonary diagnosis for this patient?
2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen pulmonary disease.
3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
Management of the Disease
*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.
1. Classify the patient’s disease severity. Is this considered stable or unstable?
2. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
3. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
4. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
Week 3 Respiratory Case Study
Week 3 Respiratory Case Study | |||||||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease
The student: – Identifies the correct spirometry pattern and likely diagnosis. – Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen disorder. – Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only). – Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case. – Identifies at least three objective findings from the case. (5 Required Elements) |
|
45 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement of the Disease
The student: – Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations. – Correctly classifies the disease severity and states whether or not the disease is stable or unstable. – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each. – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for the condition. (4 Required Elements) |
|
45 pts | |||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, spelling, grammar & APA format
The student: Uses the week 3 case study template for case study responses. Provides correct in-text citations for responses which match the reference page. Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format errors. |
|
10 p |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more